Magnetic Messaging Exposed

This study has several enhanced methodological, which extended the validity of the new evidence. First of all, was a prospective cohort study in exhibition MF during pregnancy was measured before diagnosis of asthma at the meeting. This study design greatly reduces the risk of potential bias influenced by the presence of associated findings. Second exhibition (MF) and the result (the diagnosis of asthma) in this study were measured objectively without the knowledge of the other, the preoccupation with attached memory bias is, therefore, the evaluation of the results of the exhibition and variable in many epidemiological studies. Unlike many studies of cases and controls health exhibition MF MF where was etiologic family during the last rebuilt or replaced by measurement (for example, current studies of childhood leukemia), some exposure prospectively etiologic MF period (e.g. pregnancy) in this study. Also, while these measures of exposure measurement EMF in previous studies often magnetic messaging exposed depended exclusively on reminders, alternatives and place of origin, the study asked participants to use an underground electrical-II, which objectively collected their MF exposure from all sources during the pregnancy. In addition, all the diagnoses were asthma based on case studies, not in automatic information of the participants, the cause of the failure of the measurement of the performance of interest. Finally, the MF is not linked to the socio-demographic, behavioral and known multiple risk factors (table 1). 6 confusion exposure variables particularly 9 associated that US interests, a lack of association between exposure to MF and these factors make limits reliable against possible distortions of the Association had observed the number of possible confounding factors. . . . . .